I don't agree with you that Bill Gates hired assassins. I don't like his funding of population control, but that is different to hired guns. You just make wild assertions - according to you anyone with any wealth or any land has murdered someone or many people. This is nonsense - live in the real world. You could redistribute all the arable land in the world, and in ten years time, some would own more, others would lose what they had by their own stupidity or vice.
And communal ownership does not work - the Soviet Union tried it and it caused famines.
Hello again, Babette,
Brad Will, Emilio Alonso Fabian, Jose Alberto Lopez Bernal, Fidel Sanchez Garcia, and Esteban Zurita Lopez. These are the names of some of the people who have been assassinated in Mexico, when Microsoft's supported government opened fire on crowds of men, women, and children. More than twenty were killed. This was 2006. As you can, see, Andrew Carnegie's 1892 execution of workers in the Homestead Strike wasn't just a careless incident -- it was a real trend that is a definite part of Capitalist society. A century later, and your system is still hanging up the bodies of the dead and denying the smell. Oh, and then there's human rights issues in Taiwan, South/North Korea, and China, other places where union organizers are typically executed or put through forced labor. (Read the wikipedia articles for "Human Rights in..." and then those nations.)
Ah, yes, I can see you family compassion among Catholics, especially caring for a dominant Catholic nation where white Imperialists still oppress the population. Yes, deny it all together! When the Church blessed the chains of the slave and the chambers of the death camps, they weren't doing anything wrong. Even if it meant Catholics becoming slaves and victims. Quite a morality -- it doesn't even extend to those who are similar to you. They don't even exist.
I'll just repeat myself since you did...
Did the Soviet Union give everyone the right to own the land? No. Then was it communal? No.
You shouldn't believe everything that every government tells you.
There is a big difference between some company hiring people to assassinate other people and your claim that Bill Gates murdered hundreds. Prove the latter or go to the police with your wild assertions.
The land and all property under communism is supposed to be communally owned. It does not work.
Some company hiring assassins to kill other people is different than the people running that company doing the same thing? I don't understand that logic at all. Or, are you going to tell me that conditions for unionists and workers in China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Korea, etc., are good, and that they face no violent from the government? Even the UN has criticized Burma, the homeland of Walmart production, for summary executions of its own people. I'm not bringing up any new information here. You can google-verify the conditions of the working class in about three seconds for any of those nations.
The UN has recognized human rights violations by the forced labor camps employed by Microsoft and Bill Gates. If the UN knows, what do you think Sheriff Digby is going to do?
But it's not communally owned. It's owned by those who are in charge of the Communist Party. They actually own it. They're the ones who say, though, "This land is communally owned, and everyone can work it!" It's just like how your own Capitalist politicians tell you, "This is your world! It belongs to you!" No, it doesn't belong to you, or any of us (except the top 1%). They're just telling you that so you'll think that this is the height of freedom, and never try to gain anything more for yourself.
And why doesn't it work? If you asked anyone who thoroughly hates Socialism or Communism, they'll probably say "Because it just means absolute worship and power for the little, Communist Party on top, with everyone else on the bottom." Ah, so now you really see, it is just Capitalism, with different names for the same exact things.
If land was really communally owned, then every person would be able to say "I have a right to work, and to earn my bread, to this land and my own liberty with it." But, that is not the case, in either Capitalism or Statist Communism. Libertarian Socialism, or "Anarchism," has worked marvelously It ceased because of facing invasions by Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, and the Pope. And no matter how good your social organization, enough bombs will be able to blow it apart. Even so-called parliamentary "Democracy" knows that lesson.
I agree with you about Burma. I also agree that conditions for unionists in some developing countries are not good, but these are a reflection of the poverty in those countries. As their GDP improves, so does the situation of workers/unionists.
You should try to sell your anarchism through the media instead of just arguing with me. And don't tell me that because the media is owned by capitalists you can't get your message across. If you are going to use this excuse, then you are like a puppy chasing its own tail - no hope of catching it and even if it did, what would it do with it?
The fact is that anarchism is not popular, not with bosses, workers, farmers or whoever. In China farmers who may even own their own land are glad to get away from the back-breaking work and to the bright lights of the city.